CO129-057 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [7] — Page 135

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

to produce them, and I quoted on this point a case in which the East India Company succeeded.

Ava:

My protest was countenanced neither by Judge nor Counsel,

and I then handed in

for

second

the Court's written authority, expressive of my readiness

&

crept in

to give

information in my power.

In neither of the Public Prints, publishing the Evidence,

am I

0

correctly reported, and the Register's version is grossly distorted

for the purpose of personal attack.

But conviction of the

error

necessary especially in the

132

face of the complimentary terms

Evidence by the

applied to my

Chief Justice and Counsel for the

prisoner in answer to

a serious

expostulation from myself in the withers case.

As regards the result of the trial I consider it to turn entirely

on

the difference of legal opinion

between the Attorney General and

the Chief Justice - the former arguing - that the Acts of Parliament were

sufficiently comprehensive to make the acts of the Sheriff

however indirect and incomplete

come under the term Misdemeanor, the latter...

Edit History

2026-05-18 03:48:36 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
to produce them, and I quoted on this point a case in which the East India Company succeeded. Ava: My protest was countenanced neither by Judge nor Counsel, and I then handed in for second the Court's written authority, expressive of my readiness & crept in to give information in my power. In neither of the Public Prints, publishing the Evidence, am I 0 correctly reported, and the Register's version is grossly distorted for the purpose of personal attack. But conviction of the error necessary especially in the 132 face of the complimentary terms Evidence by the applied to my Chief Justice and Counsel for the prisoner in answer to a serious expostulation from myself in the withers case. As regards the result of the trial I consider it to turn entirely on the difference of legal opinion between the Attorney General and the Chief Justice - the former arguing - that the Acts of Parliament were sufficiently comprehensive to make the acts of the Sheriff however indirect and incomplete come under the term Misdemeanor, the latter...
Baseline (Original)
to produce them, and I quoted on this point a case in which the East hidin Courany Stuecrued. Ava: Me prition was contnetek neither by Judge un Cruusel, and I then handen in for scend the corruns written authority, expressive my readinces & creu intru to give information in my power. A In neither of the Publie Rints, publiching the Avidcnee, am 0 conectý reported, and the Register's version is morery distortá for the purpose of personnic attack. But coniction of the errasi meccssary especially in the 132 free of the complimentary terms Evidence by the arslied to my Chief Justice and Counsel for the priconer in ancwer to a serious expostulation from myself in the withers boy As regards the result of the trial I consider it to turn entirels ma difference of legal opinion. between the Attorney General and the Chief Justice - the former arguing - the the Acts of Parlament were Paricament were eufficiently comprehensive to make the acts of the Sheriff however indirect and incomplete come under the term Misdemeanor, the latter
2026-05-18 03:48:36 · Baseline
View content

to produce them, and I quoted on this point a case in which the East hidin Courany

Stuecrued.

Ava:

Me prition was contnetek neither by Judge un Cruusel,

and I then handen in

for

scend

the corruns written authority, expressive my readinces &

creu intru

to give

information in my power.

A

In neither of the Publie Rints, publiching the Avidcnee,

am

0

conectý reported, and the Register's version is morery distortá

for the purpose of personnic attack.

But coniction of the

errasi

meccssary especially in the

132

free of the complimentary terms

Evidence by the

arslied to my

Chief Justice and Counsel for the

priconer in ancwer to

a serious

expostulation from myself in the withers boy

As regards the result of the trial I consider it to turn entirels

ma

difference of legal opinion.

between the Attorney General and

the Chief Justice - the former arguing - the the Acts of Parlament were

Paricament were

eufficiently comprehensive to make the acts of the Sheriff

however indirect and incomplete

come under the term Misdemeanor, the latter

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.